Network Engineer L3 — Roles & Responsibilities
- Network Design & Architecture
- Own HLD/LLD for enterprise LAN/WAN, DC, and cloud connectivity
- Design redundant, scalable topologies — spine-leaf, hub-spoke, SD-WAN
- Define IP addressing, VLAN structure, routing domains, and segmentation strategy
- Escalation & Incident Ownership
- Final escalation point for L1/L2 — you close it, not pass it
- Lead P1/P2 bridge calls, drive RCA, own post-mortem
- Coordinate with NOC, security, and vendors during major incidents
- Routing & Switching (Advanced)
- Manage and tune BGP policies, OSPF areas, MPLS/VRF, redistribution
- Handle complex STP issues, VPC/MLAG, LACP, and trunk failures
- Own inter-DC and ISP peering configurations
- Security & Compliance
- Enforce segmentation — VRF, VLAN isolation, firewall zones
- Review and approve ACLs, firewall rules, NAC policies
- Support audits — PCI, ISO 27001, NIST alignment on network layer
- Cloud & Hybrid Networking
- Own AWS/Azure network integration — VPN Gateway, ExpressRoute, Transit Gateway
- Design and troubleshoot hybrid connectivity — on-prem to cloud routing
- Collaborate with cloud architects on network policy
- Automation & Tooling
- Build and maintain automation — Python, Ansible, Netmiko
- Automate config backups, compliance checks, provisioning workflows
- Integrate with ITSM/IPAM/NMS platforms
- Monitoring & Performance
- Own network observability — NetFlow, SNMP, syslog pipelines
- Proactive capacity planning — identify bottlenecks before they become incidents
- Define and track SLAs, latency, packet loss thresholds
- Documentation & Change Management
- Maintain accurate network diagrams, IP plans, and runbooks
- Author and review RFCs/change records — no undocumented changes
- Keep post-mortems and lessons-learned documented
- Vendor & Stakeholder Management
- Own TAC cases — Cisco, Palo Alto, Juniper, Fortinet
- Evaluate new hardware/software — PoC, testing, recommendation
- Present technical decisions to management and non-technical stakeholders
- Mentorship & Leadership
- Technically guide L3 engineers — knowledge transfer, not just answers
- Conduct design and config peer reviews
- Set team standards — naming conventions, hardening baselines, change process
Desired Candidate Profile — Network Engineer L3
Technical Depth
- Can design end-to-end — not just configure what's handed to them
- Understands why a protocol behaves a certain way, not just how to configure it
- Reads packet captures, interprets routing tables, and diagnoses without a runbook
- Has broken things in production and fixed them under pressure
Core Technical Profile
DomainWhat We ExpectRoutingBGP multihoming, path manipulation, OSPF tuning, MPLS L3VPNSwitchingVPC/MLAG, MSTP, Q-in-Q, LACP negotiation issuesFirewallsZone-based policy, NAT hairpin, asymmetric routing issuesSD-WANPolicy-based routing, app-aware steering, overlay/underlay separationCloudExpressRoute, Direct Connect, Transit Gateway, route propagationAutomationScript-first mindset — Python, Ansible, REST APIsMonitoringCan build a dashboard, not just read one
Experience Profile
- 5–8 years hands-on — enterprise, SP, or large MSP environment
- Has owned a network migration or redesign project end to end
- Has managed multi-vendor environments — not just one OEM
- Has worked on-call and handled real P1 incidents alone
Certifications
LevelCertRequiredCCNP Enterprise / JNCIP / NSE4+Strong PlusCCIE / JNCIE / NSE7BonusAWS/Azure Networking Specialty
Problem-Solving Style
- Structured — isolates layer by layer, doesn't guess randomly
- Calm under pressure — incident bridge calls don't rattle them
- Data-driven — uses logs, flows, and captures — not assumptions
- Owns the problem — doesn't deflect to another team without evidence
Communication & Soft Skills
- Can explain a routing loop to a CISO without using BGP terminology
- Writes clean, clear documentation — diagrams match reality
- Pushes back on bad designs — respectfully, with data
- Comfortable presenting to management and defending technical decisions
Mindset
- Security-first — thinks about attack surface when designing, not after
- Automation bias — if done more than twice, it should be scripted
- Proactive — monitors trends, flags risks before they become incidents
- Continuous learner — tracks CVEs, vendor EOL, protocol RFCs
Red Flags (What disqualifies a candidate)
- Can configure but can't explain why
- Has never touched a firewall or security policy
- Relies entirely on GUI — no CLI fluency
- No experience with change management or documentation discipline
- Falls apart when the runbook doesn't apply